the Free Hypnosis Social Network
Tags:
Pesonaly you don't have to do anykind of regression that really just draws out the session and actually makes it harder on you and them. Their unconcious knows what stands between x,y and z so state specifically what they want the outcome to be and work backwards to have y and x, because you already have z by then. Want to know more ? If so you know what to do.
There is no best technique -- Sue. But, hey, that's just my opinion.
FYI- I agree with John, Ricky, Adrian and Brian. I disagree with Roy and Aleksonder and again it's just my opinion.
1. John R. advised against addressing self-sabotage in your next session, suggesting that it was an assumption on your part. I agree.
My advice is: Believe in your clients! Imagine that they are doing their best and believe that you have the skills and abilities to help them reach and maintain their goals. Just my opinion- mind you...
I agree with Ricky and Adrian -- AR is not necessary -
I think Brian gave you excellent advice. If you are interested in adding AR to your toolbox I recommend adding Boyne-enhanced-AR and/or Hunter-enchanced-AR. Both approaches can be very effective! Once again, just my opinion --
Roy Hunter is an outstanding hypnosis professional and educator and I consider him a friend. Roy and I have as they say history, in that we have been teaching at the same conferences for decades and we have both enjoyed watching each other grow and distinguish ourselves in the field. The only problem that I have with Roy is that he sometimes forgets to say "In my opinion" or "I believe"
Roy posted: "Some of the clients some of the time WILL need regression in order to discover and release the core cause, otherwise the results might be either temporary or partial."
I disagree with Roy's opinion and belief that some clients WILL need regression. I do believe that for some clients -Enhanced RA is the best way to go in terms of their world views and culture, but there are many ways to stroke a cat, but first you must be naturally able to or learn how to earn the clients trust. After that it's different strokes for different folks.
Back to your client- If I read you correctly - You are not sure if you are ready to use RA with this client.
Here is an alternative -
Intro: if ever a client doesn't get a desired result you have to give them a reason to continue believing that you can help them--
It could be as simple as telling her - Every one responds to hypnosis in their own way and some people seem to need to take a step back, before moving forward and reaching and maintaing their goals - Recommend a several session program that will
help her think and feel in ways that promote feeling and looking great-
Meet your clients expectation for a hypnotic experience using your induction of choice for this client and
1. Focus the client's attention on the benefits and advantages of feeling and looking great
2. Teach the client to relax more and stress less
3. Motivate the client to eat less and exercise more -- (Benefits and Advantages of Feeling and Looking Great!)
And all of this moves us into the realm of helping clients discover that there is a direct relationship between their health and weight and the choices they make.
Hint- I would check out the nutritional counselors in my hood and identify the ones who are hypno-friendly and recommend that she forget about dieting and put her energy on developing a healthy diet while you support her hypnotically--
If you learn anything from this thread, I hope it is that you are too smart to pay attention to any one who tells you that there is only one way to help clients... Again, just my opinion...
Warmest regards,
Michael E.
Hiya Alexsonder,
Apologies - I certainly would not want you to feel unwelcome. It seemed to me that our debate was simply a bit spicy...
Lets try again.
I think you're saying: you have to address the root cause of a person's presenting issues in order for a person to fully and truly heal, and that direct suggestion wouldn't be enough to do that due to negative forcing functions (which require some form of associated regression-to-cause / affect ventilation to remove). Anything else is 'band-aid' therapy and the effects typically temporary.
(This is a position taken by many on this board, especially those who've trained with Kein / Banyan etc. I can relate to it, in that I have had cases - many cases, where this has seemed true).
However, not always true. So, I'm simply saying in return that non-regressive techniques can be highly effective when it comes to removing "negative forcing functions" in order to bring about true healing. True healing, not "band-aid therapy". Essentially, there is more than one way to skin a cat, and hypnos (in my opinion) should avoid ossification at all costs.
My point isn't a million miles away from yours, but I guess it is different. Again apologies if I pissed you off. I hope that we can now debate the points and I'll play nice as it were, we're here to learn after all.
Cheers,
Adrian
PS: I find it hard to place myself as either idealist or realist. I can see how you're an idealist, but it seems that John is in fact just a miserablist! ;-)
© 2012 Created by Scott Sandland.