the Free Hypnosis Social Network
Tags:
So you wouldn't say that it is a state of compliance? I just don't like to think of it this way that's all.
Conca
Then don't- as long as your model of hypnosis helps you to produce the desired results then it doesn't matter if your outlook isn't in "compliance" with someone elses.
Conca said:So you wouldn't say that it is a state of compliance? I just don't like to think of it this way that's all.
Conca
I think of it more as a an overload of the consciousness and they just follow suggestion due to inability, or lack of a logical response. Except for PR, of course that would be more of a want to do it, I would think. You can hypnotize people that don't wan't to be hypnotized with just talking and they could be ignoring you and which that just makes it easier. I've hypnotized several ppl on accident, just messing around with some of my ideals with some people at work. Presupositions and embeded commands go along way if placed in the right order, even if they know what you are doing, because to understand you have to process the information. It's just when to hi jack their trance, or not, because as soon as we have a change it can be drastically changed in the matter of seconds, or less.
Hi Conca,
If you ask 50 hypnotists about their model of hypnosis you are likely to get 50 different models -- My suggestion is to get to know the different models and model your theories and practice in your image-
Michael E.
Compliance is useful, but it's not hypnosis.
Compliance is useful, because it ensures that the subject will follow your direction even when it goes against their inclination. That's important, because in the therapeutic stuff you're working against the way they've been doing things. So testing for compliance weeds out 'resistant' subjects.
Also, if someone is not compliant then there's a strong likelihood that their heart isn't in changing. One way to get compliance is to do a values elicitation around their desired future. Then you stack those values and link them to the hypnotic situation. Now if they don't comply, you know there's some ecology check or secondary gain, or so forth, that's working against change. Or they're just ornery.
But, if you're asking a technical question as a hypnotist, then no, compliance has nothing to do with hypnosis. If you can get a nice strong polarity response -- a "no set" -- then you can amplify it, accelerate it, and tell the person, "...then it's absolutely impossible for you to go into trance, now..." That's not compliance; that's resistance. You can use either one, because both are reliable responses. (But be quick with resistance. You have to keep laying it on; if you pause to take a breather, they'll adapt their resistance strategy. When someone adapts their compliance strategy, that can work against you, too, as when they decide to consciously help out.)
The general pattern is to look for reliable responses that you can leverage. Confusion inductions aren't compliance or resistance. They're just ways to take advantage of reliable responses.
Conrad.
ps - The other general pattern is to offer value. When people understand at a deep level that you're working toward and in alignment with their values, you get cooperation from the unconscious mind. And that's golden.
Where can I find information on different models?
Conca
Michael Ellner said:Hi Conca,
If you ask 50 hypnotists about their model of hypnosis you are likely to get 50 different models -- My suggestion is to get to know the different models and model your theories and practice in your image-
Michael E.
© 2012 Created by Scott Sandland.