the Free Hypnosis Social Network
Tags:
Compliance Where? When? How? for what Purpose?
Do you mean, is the client complying by 1) doing exactly what the hypnotist says, rather like a robot, or 2) achieving the expected outcome, no matter the process used to get there?
Do you mean compliance by simply going into trance as the hypnotist suggests, by whatever method of induction is used? Or do you mean the subject sings like Madonna on stage, because they were told to do so by the hypnotist? Or do you mean the client begins to eat better and exercise more, based on the suggestive instructions given by the hypnotist for weightloss?
Is "compliance" a factor in hypnosis? Of course. No matter if you are doing clinical hypnosis or a stage performance, if your subject does not respond in such a way as to meet the pre-expected goals, then their non-compliance has possibly created a 'failed' experience.
But, not necessarily. It all depends on the goals of the experience.
If they did not sing like Madonna, but sang like Elvis instead, were they non-compliant? If the overall goal was simply to create an entertaining stage show, then the experience was not a failure, correct?
If they did not raise their arm very high as instructed in the balloon/book test, but they were still in a deep trance state, and still became a non-smoker at the end of the clinical session, were they non-compliant?
Compliance is a factor, just as is confidence and so forth, but mostly it's the process as a whole and whether the expected outcome is met or not, that determines "failure" or "success" during a hypnotic experience.
2 cents
~ Paula
Conca
In effect, what Jonathan Royle says has some truth to it. It is true in the same way that "All hypnosis is self-hypnosis" is true; philosophically.
Let me explain:
The judgmental mind controls our behavior. It determines what we will do and what we won't do. Even in trance, this watchdog is ever present. It can be fooled, it can be mislead, but it still monitors and okays suggestions. If you doubt it, suggest something that you know would violate the subject's moral or ethical codes and see what happens. In this way, trance can be viewed as a state of compliance.
This is the reason that I always include "is that okay with you?" after I give a suggestion. It removes all doubt from both of us and insures I get compliance from the judgmental part of the mind.
Other than that, trance effects are just automatic reaction to outside input.
I hope this helps you
John
Conca,
I think that JR's view is more nuanced than 'an acted out state of compliance' would suggest.
For example, if I could get you to pretend that you couldn't feel your hand, such that your mind convinced your body, which further convinced your mind - creating a bit of a feedback loop - then you might get to a point where you couldn't actually feel your hand. That's very different to the sort of 'social compliance' claim people normally throw at Stage Hypnotists.
Due to Jonathan's (how shall I put it...?) crassness, I think that people often assume that he is some sort of opinionated hack. However, he is actually a very experienced and effective hypnotist. I work closely with a Harvard Street hypnotherapist who has done all the levels of NLP training, as well as numerous courses with most of the 'names' in hypnosis, and she said that she's never gone "deeper" than when Jonathan hypnotised her on one of his courses. She now uses his CMT script for all manner of cases.
Similarly, I'm not sure that Derren Brown would say it is nothing more than that, even if that is a big part of it. He speaks of 'persuasion without awareness' which is clearly not the same thing as straightforward compliance.
I don't know who first came up with the phrase 'social compliance' but it sounds like a euphemism for play-acting and a subject not in a genuine trance. some of it is some of it is not. now take the original meaning of the word somnambulism- a person who carries out activities in his sleep such as raiding the fridge in his sleep with no memory of it the next morning. he's not being compliant, he has an unconscious compulsion to raid the fridge and actually does it unconsciously. what has this got to do with hypnotism? well, an early name for hypnotism was artificial somnambulism because a state resembling somnambulism was induced in the subject and he felt compelled to act upon any suggestion.
at that level of hypnosis, which I've experienced for myself, the bits I do remember, which is very little, the hypnotists instructions seem more like my own inner voice and I did not even think that another person was putting them in my head. although there is some unconscious resistance and I'm sure occasionally I was coming out of the trance, which was the bits I remembered, although not totally.
Conca
In effect, what Jonathan Royle says has some truth to it. It is true in the same way that "All hypnosis is self-hypnosis" is true; philosophically.
Let me explain:
The judgmental mind controls our behavior. It determines what we will do and what we won't do. Even in trance, this watchdog is ever present. It can be fooled, it can be mislead, but it still monitors and okays suggestions. If you doubt it, suggest something that you know would violate the subject's moral or ethical codes and see what happens. In this way, trance can be viewed as a state of compliance.
This is the reason that I always include "is that okay with you?" after I give a suggestion. It removes all doubt from both of us and insures I get compliance from the judgmental part of the mind.
Other than that, trance effects are just automatic reaction to outside input.
I hope this helps you
John
Here my view - I see Hypnosis as a naturally occuring brain-wave enrgy pattern shift into relaxation, opening the subconscious mind to a more open place for suggestion, which occurs in most people 7 times a day. Some have said others are thinking it's not a brain-wave shift. There are 3-D scans that show this shift occuring.
© 2012 Created by Scott Sandland.