HypnoThoughts.com

the Free Hypnosis Social Network

Henxy

Irritating Quote of the Century... Or Millennium?!

'[Hypnosis] can be used for the reduction of both emotional pain and distress, and physical pain. Hence the usefulness of hypnosis in both medicine and dentistry and the inherent dangers of hypnosis used by non-professionals.'

Other than the grammar, how many more reasons are there to be annoyed by this comment in an HT training manual?!

Views: 13

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hmmmm. Well, acute pain (like from appendicitis) is your body's way of telling you that something is really in need of your attention...and if you could learn how to turn off all pain, all the time, that could be a bad thing. In fact, I think there's a medical condition where people are unable to feel pain, so they can burn themselves, break bones, etc. and not even know it.

Maybe that's what they mean?

Kathleen Hanover
"The Pretty Goodest Public Relations
Copywriting & Marketing Lady on the Planet"
I think my degree of annoyance would be dependent upon who wrote it! From some people I would absolutely expect such a statement and feel free to disregard with no hackles raised. If it came from an unexpected source, I might take issue.

Hypnosis is powerful, and as we've discussed in other threads dangerous in the wrong hands, professional or otherwise.
This follows the Yapko belief that professional means medically-qualified AND trained in HT...

BSCAH, since you ask, IJ!
We all know that hypnosis is very effectively used by many, many non-medical practitioners. Other than those charlatans who are trying to brainwash people using hypnosis (that's my sarcasm, you understand!), I'm not sure what they mean by "inherent dangers".
I'm with you Rita. There are dangers and there are "inherent dangers". I sure am not buying into the presupposition that the Dangers are "inherant" in the use of hypnosis by anyone other than "them".

Hugh Cole
The Pretty Goodest Hypnotist on the Planet

Rita Ballard, C.H. said:
We all know that hypnosis is very effectively used by many, many non-medical practitioners. Other than those charlatans who are trying to brainwash people using hypnosis (that's my sarcasm, you understand!), I'm not sure what they mean by "inherent dangers".
Perhaps this will cheer you up?

"If we have any special knowledge about hypnosis. It is our ethical obligation to share this knowledge with others who in their own field are diligently pursuing their own work. By sharing we can very likely learn from them as well. To presumptuously claim that only we can utilize this knowledge inflates our role, invites ridicule, and undermines our own credibility.
Is a police interrogator any less competent to handle a possible abreaction or to seek appropriate psychiatric or psychological help than a dentist? Since it is well documented that dentists make excellent use of hypnosis, why do we expect less of another professional group whose primary training is likewise not in psychology or psychiatry or medicine."
- Dr. Herbert Spiegel, Professor of Psychology Columbia University School of Medicine
American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis (Vol.. 23, No. 2)
Personally, I like being a little bit dangerous. heh heh

Thanks, Michael, that does cheer me!
Interesting, Michael... That this course is very focused on Elman/Spiegel. Maybe I should share your quote with them?! ;-)
I'm not even taking this course, yet I find its 'up-its-own-arseness' incredible!

Why use a monosyllable when a big long word will do? Why use accessible language when pseudo-medical will be able to scare off some normal human beings?!

Bless. The insecurities of some!
I can see their point who would want their teeth done or appendix taken out by a non professional? using hypnosis or not?!

;-)
What is the issue? Last time I looked, we are all professionals.
Whats HT?

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2012   Created by Scott Sandland.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service