the Free Hypnosis Social Network
Stage show hypnosis takes control of another’s belief and then subjects them to humorous scenarios.
Is this right or wrong?
Don't forget the victims volunteer to go before their peers!
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Saul Rosenfeld on May 3, 2010 at 9:37am Haven’t logged on for a while… and seems Saul is still trying to sell his book using some kind of egocentric fear tactic.
The last book I read from a “Saul” was the guy who threw the first stone at one of Jesus’ boys; changed his name to “Paul” and told the whole world that the undisputable “FACT” is: "they are all sinners!”.
He even started a religious cult responsible for killing millions and destroying peaceful “pagan” civilizations all under the motto: “Love Thy Neighbor!”
That cult survived 2000 years and still thrives today!
Permalink Reply by Scott Sandland on May 3, 2010 at 10:55am
Permalink Reply by Saul Rosenfeld on May 3, 2010 at 12:29pm MODERATORS NOTE
This thread is at risk of being deleted. Stay productive and on topic or it will go away. I hate removing content, so let's be smart about all this.
thank you.
Scott Sandland
Permalink Reply by Wayne James Fearn on May 3, 2010 at 8:44pm
Permalink Reply by James Hazlerig - HypnosisAustin on May 3, 2010 at 9:54pm
Permalink Reply by Mike Payne on May 3, 2010 at 10:42pm Haven’t logged on for a while… and seems Saul is still trying to sell his book using some kind of egocentric fear tactic.
The last book I read from a “Saul” was the guy who threw the first stone at one of Jesus’ boys; changed his name to “Paul” and told the whole world that the undisputable “FACT” is: "they are all sinners!”.
He even started a religious cult responsible for killing millions and destroying peaceful “pagan” civilizations all under the motto: “Love Thy Neighbor!”
That cult survived 2000 years and still thrives today!
Now that really shows the “frightening” power of hypnosis!
LOL
mike
Saul Rosenfeld said:Richard,
Whatever made you assume (totally INcorrectly) that I started out with a premise and then spent 13 years trying to PROVE it? Why, that's absurd!
I started out with a clean slate, and wanted to write a totally different KIND of "history of hypnotism" book that presented a type of "unified field theory" linking the past two centuries together in an attempt to discover WHY such an incredibly benevolent and powerful force for HEALING (which was already recognized back in the 1780's!) came to be regarded with universal DISDAIN instead of being hailed by all as a miraculous natural modality for curing ailments.
I had NO IDEA where my research would lead me....NONE! But as the years passed, and as I read more than 1,000 primary and secondary books and articles spanning those two centuries, it became clearer and clearer that there was a REASON why people were frightened or put off by hypnosis and hypnotists- and that reason was the terrible IMAGE created and SUSTAINED by PUBLIC DISPLAYS of HIGHLY AUTHORITARIAN INDUCTIONS and ROUTINES!
It was the same in EVERY country, and throughout various eras.
The fact that YOU don't LIKE what my research revealed doesn't alter the FACTS one iota.
The fact that your stage hypnotist colleagues have, throughout the years, singlehandedly SUSTAINED this HIGHLY NEGATIVE IMAGE by DELIBERATELY giving their audiences the PERCEPTION that they CONTROLLED THE MINDS of their "hapless" subjects is a MATTER of RECORD, and you can try to refute it all you want, but it will NEVER change the FACTS. Not "MY" facts, but the HISTORICAL RECORD. It is there for ALL to see, but just so happens that I was the FIRST person to have ever put all these diverse bits of EVIDENCE together.
Once again, I started out with a clean slate, and had NO IDEA what I would discover (how COULD I?!).
And why WOULD I be biased against stage hypnotists? I'VE never been humiliated on stage- I've never had any personal REASON to be prejudiced against them!
But it doesn't surprise me in the least that you accuse me of doing so (and "accuse" is the correct word!), because it takes the onus off YOUR colleagues and puts it on ME. That's called "shooting the messenger", and it's a rather pathetic tactic to say the least.
I'd hoped, in vain, that you and at least SOME of your colleagues would be more "open minded"- if only out of curiosity, or to see if I could at least "POSSIBLY" be right.
I suppose I should have known better.
My bad.
And... pan left... fade to black..... and we are OUT....its a wrap.
Saul
www.HistoryOfHypnotism.com
P.S. One more thing. It's quite humorous indeed the way you...imply...that I'm shilling for my book by spending countless hours of my valuable time on such discussions (LOL!). Let me see, how did you phrase it?
"Your book, ( which I assume is getting great press and publicity because of the number of times it is brought up in this conversation) is not PROOF that your opinion is the correct one about stage hypnosis."
Yes, the press has been following this debate with all the fervor of the Tiger Woods scandal! My phone hasn't stopped ringing, and the publicity has become SO frenzied that the paparazzi are camped outside my door hoping to catch a glimpse of me. As a direct result of this discussion, sales have exploded, and my new Ferrari is already on order (as well as a Porsche Carrera for the wife).
Thank you HypnoThoughts for making me wealthy beyond my wildest dreams!
LOL
Permalink Reply by Wayne James Fearn on May 3, 2010 at 11:08pm Back from the weekend, and still joining Richard in the act of ignoring this thread.
James
Permalink Reply by Sally on May 5, 2010 at 12:01pm I suppose you might wonder who is having the fun...and of course, that's subjective. My taste in humor is different than someone's else. Most volunteers for stage hypnosis have expectation of the type of stunts they will participate in, so I see nothing wrong with it. If a viewer is offended, that's the risk of attending such an event, as is the possiblity of watered-down drinks!
Now if the audience and participants are having fun at the hypnotist's expense...THAT might be an interesting show to see!
Rory McCauley replied to Gabrielle Guichard's discussion Induction for analytic person only?
John Cleesattel replied to Gabrielle Guichard's discussion Induction for analytic person only?
Graham Old replied to Gabrielle Guichard's discussion Induction for analytic person only?
Gabrielle Guichard replied to Gabrielle Guichard's discussion Induction for analytic person only?
Susie Gale replied to Marx Howell's discussion ISIFH International Society for Investigative & forensic Hypnosis in the group Hypnosis Trainings Bulletin Board© 2012 Created by Scott Sandland.