the Free Hypnosis Social Network
Tags:
I agree. Avoid the diatribe and ad hominum. Feel free to attack any argument with passion, but direct it to the words, not the person.
Not sure about your choice of the word 'debate', Roy. This surely indicates an argument (contest) won by skillful rhetoric, rather than reason, logic, and 'truth'? ;-)
Ian
Ok Everyone,
Some board moderation has me bite my tongue a little more sometimes than I might prefer, but it still doesn't kill my desire to post if I feel strongly enough on something or sometimes silly enough.
Sometimes, I think people take things meant in good humour a little too seriously, taking offence rather than enjoying humour for what it's worth.
Same with debates. Sometimes people tend to make way more of an issue of something by simply misinterpreting the tone of someone's words and immediately taking offence, easy to do when you can't see or hear "tone" as you can in voice chat.
Maybe the boards could be a little more entertaining or conducive to discussions if people would loosen up a bit and some "they know who they are" stop being killjoys.
Warmest Regards
Scott
For example, you would not believe how mean spirited the "alt.hypnosis" newsgroup became a number of years back when only a few internet "trolls" drove most professionals away. On occasion comments such as "if you can't take it..." would appear whenever responding to such flames. It got to the point where a professional would lose whether or not he/she responded to the flaming criticism.
Public criticism puts the recipient in a no-win situation AND makes our profession look bad.
BTW, I would like to thank everyone who has responded to this discussion so far.
Best wishes,
Roy
© 2012 Created by Scott Sandland.