the Free Hypnosis Social Network
Tags: inappropriate, laughter
Permalink Reply by Henxy on August 3, 2009 at 8:24am
Permalink Reply by Fable Goodman on August 3, 2009 at 9:36am
Permalink Reply by John Cleesattel on August 3, 2009 at 8:18pm
Permalink Reply by J Z Williams on August 7, 2009 at 1:24am
Permalink Reply by John Cleesattel on August 7, 2009 at 6:47am Hi John,
Yourself and others have mentioned parts therapy and so I am re reading Roy Hunters chapter on Parts in the Art of Hypnotherapy. I have not used this much before,and I noticed from his book that he prefers not to use this method in the first session because he feels the first session should be pleasant.
Does anyone else have any thoughts on this. Thanks for your comments by the way.
Permalink Reply by Steve Andrade on August 7, 2009 at 6:54am Hi John,
Yourself and others have mentioned parts therapy and so I am re reading Roy Hunters chapter on Parts in the Art of Hypnotherapy. I have not used this much before,and I noticed from his book that he prefers not to use this method in the first session because he feels the first session should be pleasant.
Does anyone else have any thoughts on this. Thanks for your comments by the way.
I guess I don't understand why a parts therapy session should be considered unpleasant? Most of my clients think its pretty neat. I haven't read Roy Hunter's book, so I don't know what he says about it, or why he thinks it would be unpleasant. Hmmm... Ah well, follow those you wish to follow and good luck with it.
John
J Z Williams said:Hi John,
Yourself and others have mentioned parts therapy and so I am re reading Roy Hunters chapter on Parts in the Art of Hypnotherapy. I have not used this much before,and I noticed from his book that he prefers not to use this method in the first session because he feels the first session should be pleasant.
Does anyone else have any thoughts on this. Thanks for your comments by the way.
Permalink Reply by John Cleesattel on August 7, 2009 at 10:44am The "unpleasant" comment is simply that parts therapy, like regression work, can bring up some uncomfortable stuff. Such as finding out there's a part of you that *wants* you to be fat. Like Steve said, Roy's book has the idea that the first session should be about conditioning and making sure their first experience of hypnosis is as completely positive as possible. No dealing with "heavy" stuff in that first session.
Parts therapy isn't necessarily unpleasant, but it *can* be, so he prefers to do it after that initial conditioning session. Steve, I've got his book, though not the newest one, and I've taken his weekend class on it. Good stuff. Definitely look into getting it.
Joshua
Permalink Reply by Ryan Joseph O'Leary on August 7, 2009 at 10:44am The "unpleasant" comment is simply that parts therapy, like regression work, can bring up some uncomfortable stuff. Such as finding out there's a part of you that *wants* you to be fat. Like Steve said, Roy's book has the idea that the first session should be about conditioning and making sure their first experience of hypnosis is as completely positive as possible. No dealing with "heavy" stuff in that first session.
Parts therapy isn't necessarily unpleasant, but it *can* be, so he prefers to do it after that initial conditioning session.
Steve, I've got his book, though not the newest one, and I've taken his weekend class on it. Good stuff. Definitely look into getting it.
Joshua
John Cleesattel said:I guess I don't understand why a parts therapy session should be considered unpleasant? Most of my clients think its pretty neat. I haven't read Roy Hunter's book, so I don't know what he says about it, or why he thinks it would be unpleasant. Hmmm... Ah well, follow those you wish to follow and good luck with it.
John
J Z Williams said:Hi John,
Yourself and others have mentioned parts therapy and so I am re reading Roy Hunters chapter on Parts in the Art of Hypnotherapy. I have not used this much before,and I noticed from his book that he prefers not to use this method in the first session because he feels the first session should be pleasant.
Does anyone else have any thoughts on this. Thanks for your comments by the way.
Permalink Reply by Donna Carter on August 7, 2009 at 12:00pm
Permalink Reply by Steve Andrade on August 7, 2009 at 12:03pm Joshua
Thanks for the explanation. As someone from the old "one session is all it takes" school of thought, it was not something I had considered in the past. None of my clients were ever upset or uncomfortable during parts therapy and mostly viewed it as a neat experience that usually revealed what the problem really was. Happy news for them because now they knew and it could be addressed. However; as one who now understands the value of multiple sessions from a business standpoint, the first session being used only for establishing a positive experience and conditioning the client, works as good as any other sound business philosophy
Rory McCauley replied to Gabrielle Guichard's discussion Induction for analytic person only?
John Cleesattel replied to Gabrielle Guichard's discussion Induction for analytic person only?
Graham Old replied to Gabrielle Guichard's discussion Induction for analytic person only?
Gabrielle Guichard replied to Gabrielle Guichard's discussion Induction for analytic person only?
Susie Gale replied to Marx Howell's discussion ISIFH International Society for Investigative & forensic Hypnosis in the group Hypnosis Trainings Bulletin Board© 2012 Created by Scott Sandland.