the Free Hypnosis Social Network
I find "Jakes" account interesting and while I would disagree with him on some points, he does lend credence to the notion that those of us who are not licensed in a mental health discipline should avoid the titles of being a "hypnotherapist" providing "hypnotherapy" as what we do is different than what therapists do.
A certified hypnotist providing motivational coaching as he describes along with teaching stress management skills is a more honest description of what most of us do.
Jake notes that "everyday" issues like weight loss and smoking may be attached to a deeper pathology, which certainly is true in some cases. However if a person is clearly disturbed, are there actually certified hypnotists who don't know that they need to be referred along to someone better equipped to help them?
However, he doesn't consider that sometimes when a person with these kind of issues achieves a worthwhile goal, it often has a positive ripple effect in the rest of their lives. Often quitting smoking, losing some excess weight, overcoming a fear or becoming more confident in school, athletics or the workplace can do wonders for a person.
And he also doesn't take into account that the majority of people who come to see us don't have bona fide mental health problems and often prefer to be helped by someone who is not part of the formal mental health system.
Jake himself admits that he seemed to help a number of people although "I often found myself feeling frustrated because I wanted to help my clients more than I had the capacity to." Since this article was posted on a site dedicated to the development of critical thinking, I am curious as to whether Jake has any data that would show that he (or the rest of us) are less effective in working with the "everyday problems of everyday life" than the licensed practitioners? I perceive a big assumption here.
However since he wants to work with the larger psychological issues he is doing the right thing in pursuing an advanced mental health degree and I wish him luck. Jim
James, I have strongly disagreed with this idea we need to refrain from using the word therapy.
I certainly do not think of someone being a psychologist or PhD when I hear the title "massage therapy" or "massage therapist" ... I equate the title with what it is.
Perhaps the focus of the medical and psychological occupations should be the diploma mills that pump out the less than credible degrees.
James Malone said:I find "Jakes" account interesting and while I would disagree with him on some points, he does lend credence to the notion that those of us who are not licensed in a mental health discipline should avoid the titles of being a "hypnotherapist" providing "hypnotherapy" as what we do is different than what therapists do.
A certified hypnotist providing motivational coaching as he describes along with teaching stress management skills is a more honest description of what most of us do.
Jake notes that "everyday" issues like weight loss and smoking may be attached to a deeper pathology, which certainly is true in some cases. However if a person is clearly disturbed, are there actually certified hypnotists who don't know that they need to be referred along to someone better equipped to help them?
However, he doesn't consider that sometimes when a person with these kind of issues achieves a worthwhile goal, it often has a positive ripple effect in the rest of their lives. Often quitting smoking, losing some excess weight, overcoming a fear or becoming more confident in school, athletics or the workplace can do wonders for a person.
And he also doesn't take into account that the majority of people who come to see us don't have bona fide mental health problems and often prefer to be helped by someone who is not part of the formal mental health system.
Jake himself admits that he seemed to help a number of people although "I often found myself feeling frustrated because I wanted to help my clients more than I had the capacity to." Since this article was posted on a site dedicated to the development of critical thinking, I am curious as to whether Jake has any data that would show that he (or the rest of us) are less effective in working with the "everyday problems of everyday life" than the licensed practitioners? I perceive a big assumption here.
However since he wants to work with the larger psychological issues he is doing the right thing in pursuing an advanced mental health degree and I wish him luck. Jim
© 2012 Created by Scott Sandland.