Dual Inductions Via Skype

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Aino / Akpolarmom on May 13, 2010 at 9:00pm

Using the "MP3 Skype Recorder" I have found that the signal is split on incoming and out going sound. That means that if record a induction I would get myself on one channel and my other trancer on the other, as well as the sounds from the subjects. But as being on the receiving end it would not be in stereo.
Too bad, but at least we could create a impromptu session on an mp3.....

Permalink Reply by Antonio on May 13, 2010 at 11:14pm

Yeah, the only problem with that is that it can't be done live :(

Aino / Akpolarmom said:

Using the "MP3 Skype Recorder" I have found that the signal is split on incoming and out going sound. That means that if record a induction I would get myself on one channel and my other trancer on the other, as well as the sounds from the subjects. But as being on the receiving end it would not be in stereo.
Too bad, but at least we could create a impromptu session on an mp3.....

Permalink Reply by Jan Krüger on May 17, 2010 at 7:16pm

I'm pretty sure Skype doesn't allow you to do that, nor does any other voice chat program I know of. Sorry for the bad news. :)

Permalink Reply by Aino / Akpolarmom on May 21, 2010 at 6:02pm

But even if the idea is to create a dual induction in "real life" on skype, e.i. the feeling that two people are talking to one client at the same time... it will still work in the fact that it is two different voices. One does not have to use the stereo effect for it to be effective. Just the fact that suddenly a different voice breaks in is enough to create the effect.
Now, if you desire to end up with a product as a recording, where the subject heard both hypnotists and later wants to revisit, the two hypnotists simply just record their own voice, and only their voice, and then merge them assigning each to the R or L channel. One could then even perfect this with some of the effects on audacity. etc. The voices would then be spaced just right as it would be easy to 'mark' the beginning point on both recordings and then just match them up. Lots of possibilities. Let's not hang our abilities on the limitations of Skype or distance between us.

Aino

Permalink Reply by Devin Scannura on July 31, 2010 at 4:39pm

the call can be recorded using audacity and then have the two tracks overlap each other.

If anyone wants to try this with me, my SKYPE is devin.scannura

Aino has great ideas for skype....awesome.

I want to play!

Permalink Reply by Antonio on August 4, 2010 at 7:04pm

We *could* go that route, but I'd rather see the programmers over at Skype improve Skype by leaps and bounds. A ton of people have asked for "virtual conferencing" where each caller could be placed spatially in the channels. Why is skype not jumping on this, considering they want people to start paying for multi video conferencing, and considering how a TON of folks are already paying for the skype in and skype out functions.

Antonio

Aino / Akpolarmom said:

Now, if you desire to end up with a product as a recording, where the subject heard both hypnotists and later wants to revisit, the two hypnotists simply just record their own voice, and only their voice, and then merge them assigning each to the R or L channel. One could then even perfect this with some of the effects on audacity. etc. The voices would then be spaced just right as it would be easy to 'mark' the beginning point on both recordings and then just match them up. Lots of possibilities. Let's not hang our abilities on the limitations of Skype or distance between us.

Aino