the Free Hypnosis Social Network
I find myself more and more annoyed by a particular logical fallacy I hear a number of my colleagues indulging, to the point that I just can't remain silent.
Before I talk about what that fallacy is, I have to disclose why I find it so annoying: I was guilty of using it myself up until recently. So at worst, this is a rant, but perhaps I can make it a cautionary tale.
I'll slide into that tale sideways.
A few years ago, a bunch of my friends went to study spiritual healing from a, well, professional faith healer. (You could call it energy healing if you want.) Anyway, at one point a friend of mine related that this spiritual healer had a low opinion of hypnotists, because he'd had to "clean up a lot of messes hypnotists had made."
When I asked for more explanation, my friend went on, "Every time that healer gets a client who went to a hypnotist first, the hypnotist either did no good or made things worse."
It didn't take long to spot the fallacy there. I answered, "Well, of course. The vast majority of people who go to hypnotists improve, so they have no need to go to a faith healer. So it stands to reason that only those for whom hypnosis wasn't the right choice (or who saw the wrong hypnotist for them, or who gave up on hypnosis too early, and so on) will ever hire a faith healer. He drew his conclusion without a representative sample."
Now, that logic seemed pretty clear to me (and reassured my friends). But it took me a while to realize I'd been doing the same thing.
See, I've had clients who'd been to other hypnotists, or who'd been in therapy for over a year with no progress, or whose pain meds had made no impression--and in some of those cases, I was lucky enough to make a dramatic difference in a single session. So I concluded (just like the faith healer had) that I was awesome and those other people (and their methods) sucked.
Like I said, it was only a few months ago that I realized what a hypocrite--almost typed "hypnocrite" there--I was being.
And now that I've seen that, I see the same faulty logic all over the place: NLPers talking about having to help the victims of poorly done regressions, regressionists speaking dismissively of NLP approaches as superficial, direct suggestionists pissing on the Ericksonians . . .
So if there's a moral to this story, it's don't be a twerp like I was. If you get someone for whom another professional failed (or screwed up), don't assume that professional is incompetent. Don't look down on their approaches or conclude they do minimal good. Recognize that nobody's perfect. Not even you.
Comment
Comment by J3n Wilding on March 7, 2012 at 10:33pm Insightful post, James!
I think what helps keep me from falling into judgement of other hypnotists is that I come from a background of many creative disciplines and I view hypnosis as a very personalized art form. And, like other art forms films, music, paintings, etc, I recognize that each artist's style attracts a different audience. So, when a client tells me they were unsatisfied with a past experience with another hypnotist, three things come to mind:
1) That the client is looking for a better match to their expectations / artistic preference
2) That, fortunately, the other hypnotist wasn't so bad that the person wrote off hypnosis/hypnotists altogether
3) That this information gives me a perfect opportunity to find out what expectations were not met / or what processes were unappealing to the client, so I can tailor my approach accordingly.
That said, I've certainly met a few hypnotists or heard stories of a trainer or two that have left me curious as to who their audience/clientele is, in a similar way that I might wonder about a song on the radio that prompts me to quickly change the channel in search of a better groove...
Different strokes for different folks, as they say.
On the flip side, this allows me to consider that anyone who has less-than-desired results with my own services (after feeling I've given my best shot) is perhaps seeking a different flavor than what I'm offering- a difference of artistic preference. I'm happy to refer out if and when I know of someone who may better fit the palete (or pallete).
Comment by Don G. on March 7, 2012 at 3:39am Hi James,
Thanks for reminding us that we can all be guilty of "moral twerpitude!"
Don
Comment by J.E. on March 6, 2012 at 4:16pm Great Post.
Comment by Hazlerig- www.HypnosisAustin.com on March 6, 2012 at 9:46am Hi, Michael,
I'm referring to the unprofessional act of bragging on one's successes, especially when it involves bad mouthing another professional or even another profession.
About luck--Luck is where skill meets preparation. Nonetheless, if a client comes to me, and it happens that my go-to technique is exactly what they need, so I'm able to look like a miracle worker when someone else has failed to help them--that's random chance. It doesn't mean I'm not skilled or that all of my success is due to luck.
If you're broken down on the side of the road and a tow-truck pulls over, the tow-truck driver's skill and tools aren't luck--but him finding you at just the right moment is. That's what I'm talking about.
Comment by Michael Ellner on March 6, 2012 at 9:37am Hi James,
Hi James
If I'm honest although I know I'm doing certain things in sessions, most of the time I'm just as amazed as the client about the results. If someone asked what do you do, 8 times out of 10 I would have to say "i'm not exactly sure". Humble pie tastes good, sometimes I serve it myself and sometimes other bring my helping along for me!!!! Wise words as always thanks for sharing smiles Nath
Comment by Rory McCauley on March 6, 2012 at 3:18am Thanks James, a brilliant insight
Comment by Liza Boubari on March 5, 2012 at 11:05pm James - thanks for reminding us for being human - hypocrisy. I too have had clients with incredible results and some who did not fully get what they came in for. As long as I do and give my best - I also understand I can not help everyone nor cure all issues.
My response to those who complain about others and how "it" did not work - I explain what "it" is (taking responsibility for themselves - "it" can be them or part of them) and further explain it could perhpas be timing and readiness or other circumstances in their life - and that, can happen to anyone. I also believe rapport with the therapist can play a role in any therapy.
Again - thanks for sharing!
Liza
Comment by Saul on March 5, 2012 at 10:13pm Very nice post James.
Comment by John - wizardoftrance.com on March 5, 2012 at 6:41pm As always, a great post James!
John
Richard Nongard - NLPBoard.com replied to Don G.'s discussion Are Cognitive-Behaviorists Really Hypnotists in Disguise?
Barry Neale replied to Denise Meza-Moreno's discussion Help with flyers for military base
Don G. replied to Don G.'s discussion Are Cognitive-Behaviorists Really Hypnotists in Disguise?
Michael Ellner replied to Adrian G Madril's discussion If you had the opportunity to ask a question...
Thomas replied to Adrian G Madril's discussion If you had the opportunity to ask a question...
Michael Ellner replied to Adrian G Madril's discussion If you had the opportunity to ask a question...
Thomas replied to Adrian G Madril's discussion If you had the opportunity to ask a question...February 21, 2013 at 7pm to February 20, 2014 at 9pm – online/Skype/phone
© 2013 Created by Scott Sandland.
You need to be a member of HypnoThoughts.com to add comments!
Join HypnoThoughts.com