In this Entire Forum there are but 3...

Comment

Comment by Ron Franks on August 2, 2010 at 12:41am

Yes Fab, exactly! It...

could certainly have been framed as you indicated and how refreshing to encounter such understanding and openess and certainly I could have been more sensitive to social transactional components.

I see you as a 3 as well and enjoy your giving and the humbleness that characterizes it. Thanks for your contribution, for sure.

Comment by Fable Goodman on August 1, 2010 at 1:03pm

It's taken me a few days to get round to reading this, but I have no problem with understanding the way you framed the subject.

It could just as easilly been givers, takers, and equitable exchangers.

I am reminded of course of social transaction theory.

I like to think I am bit of a three.

Comment by Ron Franks on July 29, 2010 at 1:48am

@Graham - alright, so now we have 4!
@John C. - ok, so now we have another scale
@Hugh - thanks
@Richard C. - fine, so now we are up to 5!
@Michael H. - I also see you as a 3, thanks for playing my game
@Kelly - I love what I would call a "let's have fun" attitude in your comments whereever I encounter them
@Licentious - great joke and perhaps that might have been even more fun. My answer to both your questions is, I don't know, but your questions bring up additional questions for me: 1) is value something which is inherent to a thing or is it rather a quality which an individual gives to a thing? 2) is the purpose of anaysis always to change behavior and if so, whose? 3) other than changing behavior, are there other acceptable reasons for posting in this forum?
@Kathleen - thanks for your wit and charm
@Elizabeth - I haven't spent or earned one cent here either but I have bought and offered many ideas here and I have learned a great deal from framing this topic in a commercial context. Many,
if not most responders have taken me literally and that experience can prove useful to me going forward, not only in here, but also in all my communications with others. So, as you see I'm very grateful to everyone who has participated in this discussion as it has indeed served me profoundly.
@Jackie - thanks for your appreciation for having fun and your demonstation of wit - I enjoyed your comment.

Comment by Jackie Spencer on July 28, 2010 at 9:44pm

I aspire to be good enough with words to earn John's #3 position but only for the fun of it! Eric Idle's long winded sketches where he blathers on incessantly saying inherently nothing are among my favorite Python skits. If I can't be clear, I would at least like to confound in style!

Comment by Elizabeth Rose Dye on July 28, 2010 at 9:11pm

Sheeeeesh I haven't bought or sold one cent of anything here... where have I been?????

Comment by tony cott on July 28, 2010 at 8:16pm

Kelley:
Pulling out my Numerology part haha, I would say you’re a: one, because the beginning of anything is the most wonderful part of the event or a: nine, for its in the time of completion that wisdom is found, and I think most of us here have experience both of these with you, a wonderful beginning and a very wise women
With grace
Tony

Comment by Kathleen Hanover on July 28, 2010 at 6:34pm

@Hugh, am I a spammer PR maven or con artist marketeer? :)

(It's a trick question, of course. I'm all four both.) :D

I'm on hypnothoughts because my hypnotherapist and client runs the place. At least, that's why I joined, initially. It was kind of for work.

But then I got to know marvelous people like Kelley and Hugh and Fable and Michael and Richard and the scores of others I'm forgetting, and I was hooked.

I like to think of myself as the "arche-client," so I try to speak on behalf of clients when the hypnotherapist types start doing too much navel-gazing and forget what it's like to be in the comfy chair.

I also try to make people laugh, and share some of what I know. It's an ego boost, frankly, to have people thank me for spouting off about the PR and marketing thingies I love to ramble on about.

Kathleen

p.s. Couldn't agree more. Kelley is a 10. And I mean that in the most heterosexual way possible.

Comment by Kathleen Hanover on July 28, 2010 at 6:25pm

@ Licentious....I like your math.

Comment by Michael Ellner on July 28, 2010 at 6:03pm

@ Kelley

Hey Babe You're A 10

Comment by Kelley Woods on July 28, 2010 at 5:37pm

Well, gentleman, this leaves me wondering who would confess to being a 1 on Ron's or a 3 on John's scales?! I might allow Tony to award me a number, using his numerology background! Be gentle.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page